<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome OS &#8211; 12 winners and losers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html</link>
	<description>Wireless mobility - Innovation - Digital convergence - mobile web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Pearce</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator>James Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1852</guid>
		<description>I think the point of the Chrome OS is that it isn&#039;t really an OS.
Presumably I could synthesise it with full-screen web browser &amp; links to Google applications.
(Or by having a bunch of Fluid SSBs for each Google app - wait! I do this on my Mac today).
Underneath? A commodity layer of software (aka Linux) to make the hardware tick over.
The OS becomes the BIOS, the browser becomes the OS.
As for Microsoft being on the defensive? I&#039;m sure the press like a fight.
But check out their research announcement from the day *before* Chrome OS: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10280270-56.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10280270-56.html&lt;/a&gt; - and also think back to IE4&#039;s &#039;Active Desktop&#039; in the late 1990s.
Mix in some anti-trust and you have a glimpse of what Google might have ahead of them. I expect they plan to use open-source will be their get-out-of-jail card.
Like &#039;fake Steve&#039;, I note that Google&#039;s obsession with Microsoft is become a little eccentric.
Mandatory reading: &lt;a href=&quot;http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-some.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-some.html&lt;/a&gt;
:-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the point of the Chrome OS is that it isn&#8217;t really an OS.<br />
Presumably I could synthesise it with full-screen web browser &#038; links to Google applications.<br />
(Or by having a bunch of Fluid SSBs for each Google app &#8211; wait! I do this on my Mac today).<br />
Underneath? A commodity layer of software (aka Linux) to make the hardware tick over.<br />
The OS becomes the BIOS, the browser becomes the OS.<br />
As for Microsoft being on the defensive? I&#8217;m sure the press like a fight.<br />
But check out their research announcement from the day *before* Chrome OS: <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10280270-56.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10280270-56.html</a> &#8211; and also think back to IE4&#8242;s &#8216;Active Desktop&#8217; in the late 1990s.<br />
Mix in some anti-trust and you have a glimpse of what Google might have ahead of them. I expect they plan to use open-source will be their get-out-of-jail card.<br />
Like &#8216;fake Steve&#8217;, I note that Google&#8217;s obsession with Microsoft is become a little eccentric.<br />
Mandatory reading: <a href="http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-some.html" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-some.html</a> <img src='http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit Jaokar</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit Jaokar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>Good point Michael. Antivirus is also free from microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8095932.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8095932.stm&lt;/a&gt; and overall thats a good thing(with both google and msft giving free antivirus)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Michael. Antivirus is also free from microsoft <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8095932.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8095932.stm</a> and overall thats a good thing(with both google and msft giving free antivirus)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mulquin</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Mulquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1850</guid>
		<description>Other big losers should be the anti-virus anti-malware and security vendors.  Unlike Microsoft, Google have explicitly said that “We are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don’t have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work,” said Pichai.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other big losers should be the anti-virus anti-malware and security vendors.  Unlike Microsoft, Google have explicitly said that “We are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don’t have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work,” said Pichai.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit Jaokar</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit Jaokar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1849</guid>
		<description>thanks Saar. I have modified the post. Happy to go on record to say that Azure will have a much bigger impact than Google Chrome OS. Probably a seperate blog kind rgds Ajit
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Saar. I have modified the post. Happy to go on record to say that Azure will have a much bigger impact than Google Chrome OS. Probably a seperate blog kind rgds Ajit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saar</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1848</link>
		<dc:creator>saar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny that through all of the google hype, I haven&#039;t heard even one mention of Microsoft Azure.
I&#039;d expect more comparisons.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that through all of the google hype, I haven&#8217;t heard even one mention of Microsoft Azure.<br />
I&#8217;d expect more comparisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoteTheDay</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1847</link>
		<dc:creator>VoteTheDay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1847</guid>
		<description>We invite everybody to speculate on the outcome of the battle &#039;Google Chrome OS-Windows&#039;. Is Google going to knock Microsoft down? Or Windows will never be defeated as the most popular OS? Tell us - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.votetheday.com/software/google-chrome-os-kills-windows-431/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.votetheday.com/software/google-chrome-os-kills-windows-431/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We invite everybody to speculate on the outcome of the battle &#8216;Google Chrome OS-Windows&#8217;. Is Google going to knock Microsoft down? Or Windows will never be defeated as the most popular OS? Tell us &#8211; <a href="http://www.votetheday.com/software/google-chrome-os-kills-windows-431/" rel="nofollow">http://www.votetheday.com/software/google-chrome-os-kills-windows-431/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit Jaokar</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit Jaokar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>Re
&gt;&gt;
- Opera can file an antitrust suit against Google just like Netscape did on Microsoft a decade ago, ie, product bundling of OS and browser
&lt;&lt;&lt;
ha ha! but seriourly both the browser and the OS are becoming increasingly irrelevent and the cloud is becoming more relevent which does not depend as much on the browser / OS - with the exception that the cloud may need a client. Increasinly I see Chrome(which is a mix of browser and OS) to be a client for the cloud(and there wil be other clients) rgds Ajit
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re<br />
>><br />
- Opera can file an antitrust suit against Google just like Netscape did on Microsoft a decade ago, ie, product bundling of OS and browser<br />
&lt;&lt;&lt;<br />
ha ha! but seriourly both the browser and the OS are becoming increasingly irrelevent and the cloud is becoming more relevent which does not depend as much on the browser / OS &#8211; with the exception that the cloud may need a client. Increasinly I see Chrome(which is a mix of browser and OS) to be a client for the cloud(and there wil be other clients) rgds Ajit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit Jaokar</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1845</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit Jaokar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1845</guid>
		<description>Re
&gt;&gt;
so GOOD NEWS for LINUX, we gonna win this war, hahaha xD
&lt;&lt;
Not so fast :) what I meant is we saw the same impact on mobile. OS (linux) becomes less relevent with Android(the whole stack). Yes, shipments may increase but relevence definately decreases rgds Ajit
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re<br />
>><br />
so GOOD NEWS for LINUX, we gonna win this war, hahaha xD<br />
&lt;&lt;<br />
Not so fast <img src='http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  what I meant is we saw the same impact on mobile. OS (linux) becomes less relevent with Android(the whole stack). Yes, shipments may increase but relevence definately decreases rgds Ajit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KyRuX</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1844</link>
		<dc:creator>KyRuX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1844</guid>
		<description>WOW! looks like Google is entering in the war of Operating Systems... But on Linux side, because ChromeOS is Linux-based (like Android), so GOOD NEWS for LINUX, we gonna win this war, hahaha xD
&quot;Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! looks like Google is entering in the war of Operating Systems&#8230; But on Linux side, because ChromeOS is Linux-based (like Android), so GOOD NEWS for LINUX, we gonna win this war, hahaha xD<br />
&#8220;Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html" rel="nofollow">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1843</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/07/google_chrome_o.html#comment-1843</guid>
		<description>Some observations:
- Chrome OS uses Linux under the covers.
- Opera can file an antitrust suit against Google just like Netscape did on Microsoft a decade ago, ie, product bundling of OS and browser
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some observations:<br />
- Chrome OS uses Linux under the covers.<br />
- Opera can file an antitrust suit against Google just like Netscape did on Microsoft a decade ago, ie, product bundling of OS and browser</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
