<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft vs. the EU: Can we legislate to force a company to use Web standards ..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/01/microsoft_vs_th.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/01/microsoft_vs_th.html</link>
	<description>Wireless mobility - Innovation - Digital convergence - mobile web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit Jaokar</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/01/microsoft_vs_th.html/comment-page-1#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit Jaokar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/01/microsoft_vs_th.html#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andy, Ver
Like I emphasise, I am addressing a very narrow scope of thus discussion i.e. can a company be forced to follow Web standard. I am not addressing the bundling issue(since it is beyond the scope of my understanding)
Coming back to Web standads though .. forcing a company to follow web standards is a opening can of worms. Web standards are a moving target anyway.
Secondly, the existance of companies not following web standards is a choice and also a part of the ecosystem
This is my point. Same with YouTube / Flash.
Interesting you say it was a PR stunt. Thats how I saw it as well. So, I was surprised to see it come this far
I believe in the role of the government - increasingly so to get us out of recession. But this is not the way to do so! kind rgds Ajit
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andy, Ver<br />
Like I emphasise, I am addressing a very narrow scope of thus discussion i.e. can a company be forced to follow Web standard. I am not addressing the bundling issue(since it is beyond the scope of my understanding)<br />
Coming back to Web standads though .. forcing a company to follow web standards is a opening can of worms. Web standards are a moving target anyway.<br />
Secondly, the existance of companies not following web standards is a choice and also a part of the ecosystem<br />
This is my point. Same with YouTube / Flash.<br />
Interesting you say it was a PR stunt. Thats how I saw it as well. So, I was surprised to see it come this far<br />
I believe in the role of the government &#8211; increasingly so to get us out of recession. But this is not the way to do so! kind rgds Ajit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ver Noss</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/01/microsoft_vs_th.html/comment-page-1#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>Ver Noss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/01/microsoft_vs_th.html#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Monopolies must behave differently than other companies -- this is a cornerstone of how capitalism works. It would have been fine for MS to develop a crappy browser if people had to download and install it just like for other browsers. However, by tying IE to Windows, they make use of a monopoly to force their browser onto unsupecting users.
Therefore, I think the EU is right in taking on Microsoft. This may also open the door for web standards that havn&#039;t had a chance due to lack of support in IE. For example, SVG may finally see real use on the web.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monopolies must behave differently than other companies &#8212; this is a cornerstone of how capitalism works. It would have been fine for MS to develop a crappy browser if people had to download and install it just like for other browsers. However, by tying IE to Windows, they make use of a monopoly to force their browser onto unsupecting users.<br />
Therefore, I think the EU is right in taking on Microsoft. This may also open the door for web standards that havn&#8217;t had a chance due to lack of support in IE. For example, SVG may finally see real use on the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/01/microsoft_vs_th.html/comment-page-1#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/01/microsoft_vs_th.html#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>Opera launched the complaint AFTER Microsoft invaded Standards Norway and subverted the Norwegian standard process to get its OOXML file format adopted. It was a simple PR stunt. Opera firmly believes in openness of standards and feels treatened by Microsoft&#039;s patenting practice.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera launched the complaint AFTER Microsoft invaded Standards Norway and subverted the Norwegian standard process to get its OOXML file format adopted. It was a simple PR stunt. Opera firmly believes in openness of standards and feels treatened by Microsoft&#8217;s patenting practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
