<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brandwashing and Privacy: A book review of Digital Destiny: New media and the future of democracy &#8211; On Data privacy day ..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/01/brandwashing_an.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/01/brandwashing_an.html</link>
	<description>Wireless mobility - Innovation - Digital convergence - mobile web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/01/brandwashing_an.html/comment-page-1#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2009/01/brandwashing_an.html#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>Why is it automatically assumed that brands, and brand ads or messages are by definition always against the interest of the consumer?
A lot of these privacy points are of course extremely valid - but wouldn&#039;t you (to take your own example) like to be contacted about future ZZ Top concerts within your neighbourhood? Isn&#039;t this a benefit to you (as well as to the promotors, the band and the venue)?
Regulators often over-regulate, we all know that. We are not living in a black and white world, and sometimes commercial messages benefit the consumer. Granted - sometimes they don&#039;t, and sometimes abuses of trust can occur, but this isn&#039;t always a one-way street.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it automatically assumed that brands, and brand ads or messages are by definition always against the interest of the consumer?<br />
A lot of these privacy points are of course extremely valid &#8211; but wouldn&#8217;t you (to take your own example) like to be contacted about future ZZ Top concerts within your neighbourhood? Isn&#8217;t this a benefit to you (as well as to the promotors, the band and the venue)?<br />
Regulators often over-regulate, we all know that. We are not living in a black and white world, and sometimes commercial messages benefit the consumer. Granted &#8211; sometimes they don&#8217;t, and sometimes abuses of trust can occur, but this isn&#8217;t always a one-way street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
