Nokia needs to do a lot more if needs to get developer mindshare like Apple ..

While I have always been a big fan of Nokia .. I think this excellent post by Steve Litchfield – Download! – absolutely no excuse is spot on ..

Nokia have all the elements but still the dots are not complete .. and Apple shows us how to do it right ..

Like Apple, Nokia need to create a whole ecosystem and a go to market strategy that benefits third party developers. Nokia is taking steps in the right direction – but there are many gaps still

However, looking at it from a bright side ., finally .. everyone has realised that there is money in Mobile data apps .. so we should see a lot more initiatives from everyone ..

Also see Pipes, software and platforms: To be (a platform) or not to be – that is the question ..

Pipes, software and platforms: To be (a platform) or not to be – that is the question ..

Hamlet.jpg

Picture depicts Hamlet in context of the quote: To be or not to be – that is the question

HAMLET’s CHOICE

The big news last week was the launch of Opera Mobile 9.5. I will do a more detailed post about it later this week – but the Opera Mobile 9.5 launch made me think of this post ..

As Bob Dylan would say – times they are a changing – and indeed in the recent past the rate of change in the mobile data industry has been accelerated through the launch of the iPhone and the impending arrival of the Android. In early 2006, when I started talking of the significance of the full web to mobile devices including technologies like Mobile Ajax , it was an exception rather the rule. Since then, there are many companies who have been caught up by surprise in the last few years at the speed of advancement of the Mobile Web – for instance that Openwave mistimed and missed the full mobile browser wave and realized too late that the market had fundamentally shifted away from the WAP oriented world it once dominated. It shows that a company can be completely caught off guard by the rate of change .. and then would be unable to recover in time.

This rate of change can only accelerate.

If the book Future Shock Alvin Toffler talks of an accelerated rate of technological and social change which will overwhelm people and entities . We have been living in the toffleresque world especially since the Web took off .. and now we are experiencing the same in the Mobile World as the Mobile Internet starts to mirror the Internet and as the Web starts to become ubiquitous.

What does all this mean in practice?

As we start to see the Internet and the Web dominate the Mobile data industry – every player in the value chain will have to make the choice between being a Pipe, a Software or a platform – and that’s why Opera Mobile 9.5 is so significant because it leverages the Web as a platform ACROSS devices (which could also include the non mobile phone devices). This is significant since (non phone) devices offer one of the strongest growth potential for the industry as a whole.

If players in the value chain(not just Operators) don’t act – then they will have a choice made for them by the tidal wave of change by default.

Much like Hamlet’s choice – To be or not to be (a platform) is the question.

LIVING ON THE EDGE – THEDRIVERS AND THE WINNING STRATEGIES

Let us see the mobile value chain as it stands today ..

Unlike the consumer oriented value chain, we are seeing increasingly a customer driven, creation oriented value chain where the players include

a) The Social Web spanning the Web and the Mobile Web

b) The network operator

c) The device manufacturer

d) The browser

e) The operating system and

f) The SIM

If we also include the content consumption value chain, then we get two additional players

a) The content creator

b) The content aggregator

Now, let us consider what happens when the Internet and the Web become dominant players

Firstly, following Net neutrality principles , the network becomes dumb. Intelligence shifts to the edge of the network. The three entities at the edge of the network – stand to benefit the most – namely – The device, the browser and the SIM card.

Again, following net neutrality principles, customers and the developers becomes the main beneficiaries and also the main drivers

Why?

Customers – for obvious reasons. See the impact of the iPhone driven by customers if you doubt this.

Developers – for a less obvious reason – namely that as intelligence shifts to the edge of the network, we cannot anticipate in advance as to what the potential requirements are – hence the need for a vibrant developer ecosystem extending the core ecosystem in ways which are not predetermined. Thus, developer action benefits consumers – especially keeping the Long tail in view.

Thus, developers and customers determine the competitive positioning of an entity in the value chain and it’s peers

Now, in an Internet and Web dominated world, we have three choices: To be a Pipe, a Software or a platform.

THE PIPE, THE SOFTWARE AND THE PLATFORM ..

Operators are not the only ones to fear being a Pipe. In an Internet/Web dominated world – there are three choices : A Pipe, A software and a platform.

Let us define what we mean by these terms

A pipe is a pure carrier of digital information with no value addition.

A software – is a digital entity without the services layer /platform layer. It may have a developer program but does not a mindshare in the minds of the community and finally

A platform is characterized by a services layer and also a community following. This strategy stretches far beyond the developer program.

Let us look at a few examples:

a) Social networks: What was started by facebook is now a norm. Most large scale web based social networks are now platforms.

b) Networks: There are many initiatives to make the network as a platform. That’s why I have historically supported initiatives like the GSMA third party access initiative and Vodafone betavine . In addition, the network can also extend it’s influence substantially by working with the SIM – and that explains the strategies behind SCWS – which could be a powerful strategy considering the SIM, browser and the device are at the edge of the network.

c) Devices: Nokia has done a brilliant job in aligning itself with the ethos of the Internet and positioning itself as a platform. The same is not true of the others. Motorola still stuggles. Sony Ericsson Q2 profit sinks and lays off 2000 workers . Both Samsung and LG do not have the same mindshare in the minds of the community and hence are vulnerable in the new world. (The iPhone and the Android are covered below)

d) Operating systems: The valuation of Symbian shows that it had become commoditised – even when Symbian has shipped 150 million devices with annual revenue of £195 million, at £210 million – the Nokia deal values Symbian at only two times the revenue Yes, Symbian had a developer program – but not much of a mindshare in the wider community beyond that. Hence, I view Symbian more as software and less as platform

e) Browsers – Webkit is pursuing a software staretgy. This is successful but it is limited in contrast to a platform strategy (although Webkit is open sourced, most of the contributions are from big companies – most notably Apple – and not from grassroots developers)

f) The iPhone – is very significant player because of iTunes (and not only for the iPhone itself) – since iTunes is the foundation of Apple’s platform strategy and is a very significant part of it’s go to market platform.

g) Android v.s Limo – Android is a platform. Limo is mainly software. Contrary to popular comparisons in the industry – the two are not the same. See iphone vs. Symbian vs. Android vs. Limo vs. Ovi : We cannot compare an ecosystem with an operating system

h) Content aggregators: With a few exceptions like buongiorno who are extending their scope of influence by acquisitions – , most of the mobile content aggregators are stuck in the middle – and will not be able to gain mindshare in light of competition from others in the value chain.

OPERA MOBILE 9.5 – LEVERAGING THE WEB AS A PLATFORM

All this brings us to the Opera announcement last week. I will have a detailed post about it soon – but I will cover a specific aspect here: i.e. Dragon fly – Dragonfly is more than a Web based debugger for the mobile browser .. it heralds the maturity of the Web as a development platform for the Mobile browser. The browser becomes the tool to leverage the Web as a platform. This has already happened on the desktop so it makes sense that the mobile should follow – alongwith the principles of Mobile Web 2.0 . Opera believes in the vision of One Web . In order to make that a reality, you need equivalent experiences across devices. In order to ensure that the experience is equivalent, you will need first class debugging tools. So, in that context, Dragonfly is leveraging the Web as a platform through the browser across devices(not just the mobile phone) since the Opera browser powers one of the most successful non mobile phone devices in recent times – the Nintendo Wii ). Thus, this leverage plus the historic synergies between Opera and the developer community – make Opera Mobile 9.5 a significant platform play.

I will write a longer blog about Opera Mobile 9.5 covering – Cloud computing, Gears, Widgets, Community interaction, the iPhone, impact on the wider ecosystem, mobile web 2.0, developer community, go to market strategy and so on ..

TO BE OR NOT TO BE ..

Hence, to recap – Opera Mobile 9.5 – much more than just the browser. It is a manifestation of the Web as a platform – spanning devices.

But the wider impact is more significant here -

The choice between pipe, software and platform – will be one which many will have to make – either by intent or by default.

Indecisiveness and uncertainty of knowledge are the major themes throughout Hamlet. A life of action v.s. a life of silent acceptance is a drama which is being played out today in our industry; leading to a choice akin to Hamlet which many in the Mobile data industry will have to make – sooner rather than later.

As usual comments welcome ..

Image source: http://files.list.co.uk/images/2007/08/16/Hamlet—Solo.jpg

I am in Seattle mid Aug .. happy to meet/speak at any events ..

I am in Seattle mid Aug .. happy to meet/speak at any events .. attending Sigcomm 2008 (related to my PhD work) but i am happy to meet or speak at any events if we can manage it. Email me at ajit.jaokar at futuretext.com if possible

Carnival of the mobilists No 132

A bit late as often but better late than never .. Carnival of the mobilists No 132 is live at the Mippin blog and it includes an entry from me which was one of my shortest posts ever!

Congrats Opera – Opera mobile 9.5 released ..

Opera%20mobile%209.5.jpg

Congrats Opera – Opera mobile 9.5 released ..

Great news from a great company .. and many interesting features like Gears and Mobile Ajax – I will do a longer blog later – but for now – kudos to the great guys at Opera

10 ways for Operators to save money ..

This is good. well worth reading! 10 ways for Operators to save money ..

Corporate blogging, Conversations, Enterprise 2.0 and the speaker’s corner

speakers%20corner.jpg

Last week, I conducted a course at Oxford university about Web 2.0 and social networking. I have done this now for about two years and the audience is corporate(and not students).

One of the questions raised by an attendee was: Why should people in companies blog? Is there REALLY a value for corporate bloggers (and we use the term ‘blogging’ loosely to include twitter, video blogging , facebook and so on)

This is a common question – and extends often to saying that I don’t have anything interesting to say, my company will block it, etc etc ..

I take a much more people centric view to blogging .. after all – my blog discussions range from complex wireless topics like – iphone vs. Symbian vs. Android vs. Limo vs. Ovi : We cannot compare an ecosystem with an operating system to Johnny Cash doing Elvis impersonations / Bo Diddley‘ and ‘Tom and Jerry’ – Of Tom and Jerry and craving the friction of a human being

My response was:

A good blogger is someone who – if they go and spoke at Speaker’s corner in Hyde park – would still be able to attract a crowd!(speaker’s corner is an open air, impromptu debating platform)

While this may sound extreme, the principle is valid – because the content matters.

However, unlike Hyde park, this not a one way but rather a two way conversation

So, I say .. the content does not matter THAT much – but rather the ability to start a conversation matters MORE .. and to experiment, learn and evolve from that conversation matters MOST OF ALL.

So, that’s my advice to all the closet corporate bloggers .. Experiment .. engage in the conversation .. and start small and evolve from there ..

There is also the secondary reason for blogging and that is – it helps you to build your own brand – within but also outside your company(In uncertain economic climates – your personal brand had even more value)

Interestingly enough, ALL communications related to enterprise may end up as conversations. This is not some kind of utopian, woolly dream – but it is really happening. Today, we have a PR agency in the Conversation group dedicated solely to creating and facilitating market conversations – which is very interesting and I see a HUGE potential market for this – and will watch it with interest!

On Thursday evening, I am speaking at the mashup event on Enterprise 2.0 on a panel along with speakers like JP Rangaswami – Managing Director, Service Design for BT Design and Carl Bate – Vice President, Chief Technology Officer, Capgemini UK

I hope I can continue this conversation there! If you are attending this event, let’s speak

Image source: wikipedia

Wikipedia as a reputation system

After speaking to Tantek Celik (thanks Tantek for the nice pocket cheat sheet on microformats at supernova!) and Dr John Breslin , I am increasingly becoming a fan of Micorformats .

Microformats offer significant potential for a number of reasons

a) We are seeiing increasing support from vendors for microformats – Open Social with FOAF, sixapart with technologies like OpenID, the Microformats hCard and XFN, and FOAF , the RDF autdiscovery firefox plugin among others ..

b) Microformats are key drivers behind data portability and social network portability

c) Microformats lend themselves to the mobile web because any format that fosters bite sized content and social networks is beneficial for the mobile web

In this blog, I am going to explore something beyond Microformats .. Let’s call it a ‘Wikipedia reputation system’ for the lack of a better word .. And I am seeking to address two different problems –

a) With Wikipedia – we have a reputation problem – i.e. an ‘expert’ who may know more may not be actually represented on the Wikipedia article. But – Is this a really a problem? I.e. how do you say who is the expert? Will the views of a few keep knowledge closed to the many?

b) With the semantic web – we have a different problem. Specifically – who will do the semantics for the semantic web and why?(in other words, add semantic information to the Web so that it can be program readable)

But let’s first start with a site called Naymz – which aims to be a reputation site on the web However, such initiatives have a problem. If my ‘reputation’ depends on updating someone else’s site – then basically it means – If I win the Nobel prize BUT forget to update that site, then my reputation is low – irrespective of my achievements

There are many variants of this theme but they have the same ‘Nobel prize’ problem – and that’s why most people who already have a good reputation will not join a site like this since the good reputation there depends on how many people you invite etc etc i.e. contributing to the site.

Essentially, it is Google bait .. (*Your free premium placement will typically appear on the first page of Google results in the ‘Sponsored Links’ section for searches on your name. Placements are limited to $10 in spend. We reserve the right to remove or discontinue placements at any time.) And you can even pay to repair your reputation

All this CAN be useful to people (for example visibility on Google)– so Naymz may indeed be a good business but in my view, that’s not a true reputation system

However, that does not mean we don’t need a global reputation system ..

One possibility for a global reputation system is Wikipedia with microformats

Wikipedia could be improved by a reputation system .. However, that reputation system has to be emergent ..

One solution( which could utilize Microformats) is to consider an iterative refinement of an article i.e. start with an article but keep refining it. Wikipedia does this anyway – but it does not lend itself to that mechanism. So, I am saying more of a threaded discussion from which expertise would emerge

This is almost like making the ‘discuss’ page of Wikipedia more visible and then putting people who made the best changes on to the main page i.e. experts will emege by their actions in the discussions when their changes have been accepted(a reputation system) from their activity on a globally neutral system(unlike ebay which is a closed, non portable reputation).

At the moment Wikipedia does not act as a reputation system i.e. the people who make the changes are not visible on Wikipedia and are not treated as experts as such

So, if Wikipedia becomes a defacto reputation system – then it becomes more interesting.

Now, add microformats to the mix – and we solve two problems at one stroke .. Wikipedia gets a richer framework since people can be motivated to add contextual information to make their content searchable (and that act directly benefits them anyway) and microformats get their semantics .. and the world gets an open reputation system

Why Wikipedia? Because we need something global, independent and neutral to which we all contribute content and contributing that content with semantics will help Wikipedia with its reputation problem and the semantic web with its semantic motivation problem. And we, as consumers could get a global reputation system

As usual thoughts welcome

carnival of the mobilists – no 131 at mjelly ..

Was busy last week .. so posted this today – better late than never .. Carnival of the mobilists No 131 is at mjelly

Which telegraphs do we still hang on to?

This may be one of my shortest blogs and carnival of the mobilists entry .. But it may be interesting. In my Web 2.0, social networking course at Oxford university which I conduct – one of the participants L Joop Quist President of Graydon holdings mentioned that – when the landline phone was new – people used to call just to check if the telegraph had arrived! So, that makes me think – as we go to the mobile web, what ‘telegraphs’ are we clinging on to?

Thanks Joop for your participation and feedback