<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My views &#8211; The Tim O Reilly/web 2.0 issue ..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2006/05/my_views_the_ti.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2006/05/my_views_the_ti.html</link>
	<description>Wireless mobility - Innovation - Digital convergence - mobile web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Baldry</title>
		<link>http://www.opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2006/05/my_views_the_ti.html/comment-page-1#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Baldry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev5.indigocontenthost.co.uk/archives/2006/05/my_views_the_ti.html#comment-737</guid>
		<description>A well balanced and measured view Ajit, which puts many of the &#039;issues around branding&#039; etc into perspective.
This extract from your above post &quot;the whole issue was not relevant to 99.9% of the people&quot; does pretty much sum up that in many ways this was/is a &#039;storm in a teacup&#039;.
For those with a keen interest in the developments of Web 2.0 and Mobile Web 2.0 (including conference organisers now…and in the future) it will be interesting to see how this will finally play out. As you quite rightly say, only time will tell how &#039;web healthy&#039; the final resolution of this debate will be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well balanced and measured view Ajit, which puts many of the &#8216;issues around branding&#8217; etc into perspective.<br />
This extract from your above post &#8220;the whole issue was not relevant to 99.9% of the people&#8221; does pretty much sum up that in many ways this was/is a &#8216;storm in a teacup&#8217;.<br />
For those with a keen interest in the developments of Web 2.0 and Mobile Web 2.0 (including conference organisers now…and in the future) it will be interesting to see how this will finally play out. As you quite rightly say, only time will tell how &#8216;web healthy&#8217; the final resolution of this debate will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
